Ethical Aspects of Fieldwork « Richmondschoolbiology’s Weblog

The catch 22 predicament of studying natural habitats is that simply by entering the habitat you will be affecting it. Humans, being big, loud and smelly (or perfumed, if you prefer) will inevitably alter the behaviour of the wildlife and may leave the habitat in a different state than it was found in. This is, to some degree unavoidable, but the impact can be minimised by considering your potential habitat and ways in which you may affect it.

On the field course we will be sampling grassland invertebrates, rocky shore organisms, sand dunes vegetation and potentially mammals (if we can trap any!). To do so ethically requires planning. The following organisations have codes of conduct for fieldwork. Take time to read them.

The Marine Conservation Society seashore code

The Wild Flower Society code of conduct

The Amateur Entomologists’ Society code of conduct for collecting insects and other invertebrates.

Discovering the beauty of natural habitats is one of the best things about being an ecologist. We need to do our best to leave our study sites, and the animals living in them, in the best, most natural, state possible.

NHS Choices: Behind the Headlines

Stem cells could reverse eye damage December 23, 2009

A stem cell treatment “restores sight to partially blind man”, according to The Guardian. The newspaper says that stem cells grown on a special membrane were used to treat the patient and seven others with sight loss. This story comes from a study on patients with limbal stem cell deficiency, a painful eye disease that prevents the cornea renewing itself an […]

Sunscreen linked with less skin damage December 23, 2009

The Daily Mail warns that “too much sun can pile on the years”. It reported results from a new study that apparently identifies “sunburn, smoking and being overweight” as key factors in making people look older than they are. The study was based on a survey in twins assessing the link between skin ageing and various factors. It found that greater weight, smo […]

Bad Science

Today’s bible reading December 25, 2009

On the birthday of Jesus Christ – who was clearly a very nice guy, giant sky wizard issues aside – I can think of no better bible reading than this, Daniel 1:8, a description of the first ever clinical trial. Daniel and his people have been dragged off to the court of king Nebuchadnezzar, [...]

The year in nonsense December 19, 2009

Ben Goldacre, The Guardian, Saturday 19 December 2009 It’s been a vintage year for dodgy science in government. We saw reports on cocaine that were disappeared, dodgy evidence to justify DNA retention, and some government advisors who estimated the cost of piracy at 10% of GDP, to media applause, and then failed to tell everyone they’d [...]

The Naked Scientists

Tripping over Psychoactive Toads October 13, 2009

For anyone fresh out of frogs and tempted to kiss a toad instead, this article has a word of warning. Although certain species of toads do make hallucinogenic chemicals linked to a lively "trip", many produce a lethal cocktail of cardiotoxic compounds that could turn such a trip into a once in a lifetime experience, en-route to the mortuary. So whi […]

Deconstructing Chomsky - Re-writing the Innate Rules of Grammar October 1, 2009

Noam Chomsky, a rookie professor at MIT, published a ground-breaking book called Syntactic Structures, which set out a theory of Generative Grammar. He suggested that a Universal Grammar (UG) of basic linguistic principles and a Transformational Grammar of rules responsible for putting sentences together was hard wired into all of us. Some don't agree i […]

Richmondschoolbiology’s Weblog