Royal Society Prize for Science Books

BookPrize2009longlist-200

It was about this time last year that I began putting together a ‘further reading’ list for A level biologists. It was to be included in the ‘welcome booklet’ that we gave the year 12’s at the start of the year. The task was harder than you might expect. It’s easy to find good books about genetics and evolution, but other aspects of biology just don’t get written about that much. Surveying the biology teachers at school found that we had, more or less, all read the same books (these were therefore included in the list), but finding a range of books to list that we knew were good was worryingly difficult.

It’s a shame that I did not know about the Royal Society Prize for Science Books. I do now. ‘The world’s most prestigious award for science writing’ (their words, not mine) have published their longlist for this year’s award, and it makes for interesting reading.

I have to admit, I have only read one of the books on the list, the rather fabulous ‘Bad Science’ by Ben Goldacre. It’s good enough to make it onto next years further reading list. But I’m ashamed to say I haven’t even heard of any of the other books, yet alone read any of them! So, as a committed scientist, I plan to read at least one of the books on the list. I’ll be reading ‘The drunkard’s walk: How randomness rules our lives’, by Leonard Mlodinow. I’ll let you know how it goes!

The shortlist will be announced on 25th June 2009, and the winner on 15th September 2009, so you may prefer to wait until then to pick one. But do pick one! I’d love to hear from anyone who has read any of these books and could give me a review of it. If it’s good enough I’ll let everyone know.

2 Responses to “Royal Society Prize for Science Books”



Leave a Reply




Richmond School Website

RSS NHS Choices: Behind the Headlines

  • Exercise linked to fertility November 9, 2009
    “Gym workouts ‘can hit pregnancy hopes’,” warned the Daily Express today. The newspaper said that Norwegian study has apparently found that “superwoman workouts” triple the likelihood of fertility problems. This study found that high-frequency, high-intensity exercise was associated with a risk of infertility. However, the study cannot prove that heavy exerc […]
  • Lorenzo's oil disease gene trial November 9, 2009
    The genetic brain disease that was portrayed in the film Lorenzo’s Oil “has been stopped in its tracks by a gene therapy”, according to The Times. This rare but fatal disease, called adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), is caused by a mutation in a gene. Although the disease can be treated by bone marrow transplant, this requires a suitable bone marrow donor to be fo […]

RSS Bad Science

  • The Nutt Sack Affair (part 493) November 7, 2009
    Ben Goldacre, Saturday 7 November 2009, The Guardian Obviously it’s pleasing to see, in the storm of commentary over Professor Nutt’s sacking, that everyone outside of politics now recognises the importance of scientific evidence in devising laws. But a strange reasoning twitch has appeared, in the arguments of politicians and right wing commentators. Scienc […]
  • Political woo October 30, 2009
    Ben Goldacre, Saturday 31 October 2009, The Guardian. Every now and then it’s fun to dip into the world of politics and find out what our lords and masters are saying about science. First we find Brooks Newmark, Conservative MP for Braintree, introducing a bill to reduce the age for cervical cancer screening to 20. The [...]

RSS The Naked Scientists

  • Tripping over Psychoactive Toads October 13, 2009
    For anyone fresh out of frogs and tempted to kiss a toad instead, this article has a word of warning. Although certain species of toads do make hallucinogenic chemicals linked to a lively "trip", many produce a lethal cocktail of cardiotoxic compounds that could turn such a trip into a once in a lifetime experience, en-route to the mortuary. So whi […]
  • Deconstructing Chomsky - Re-writing the Innate Rules of Grammar October 1, 2009
    Noam Chomsky, a rookie professor at MIT, published a ground-breaking book called Syntactic Structures, which set out a theory of Generative Grammar. He suggested that a Universal Grammar (UG) of basic linguistic principles and a Transformational Grammar of rules responsible for putting sentences together was hard wired into all of us. Some don't agree i […]